I think I've mentioned before that I'm still trying to find an attorney who will take my case against Michael Chabon on contingency: Chabon took the season I played baseball and used it verbatim as the springboard for his novel 'Summerland.' Right up to the cool, supernatural stuff. Oh, and my Dad was a high school teacher who drove an unattractive series of used cars, most of which lacked air conditioning as well as sex appeal. He didn't cruise around in his own blimp, nor did he have any more genuine enthusiasm for baseball than his gangly, uncoordinated, unpopular first son.
I had a zero batting average, and my so-called peers never let me forget it. A collective groan resulted from me being 'at bat.' The coach would tell the kids to 'cut that out,' but how much credibility did he have? He was the same schmuck who told me the ball couldn't hurt me. With a zero batting average, the only way I got on base was with a walk. In third grade, the pitcher is the kid who can throw the ball from the mound to the plate; accuracy is not a consideration. You might get to first on four wild pitches, but you're about as likely to get on with one wild pitch. Your shin, your ass, your shoulder blade, these were as likely as the catcher's mitt to receive the pitch. The ball might not kill you, but if you think it can't hurt you, stand sixty or seventy feet from me while I hurl baseballs at you. Yeah, I'm 36, but my arm strength is comparable to a top third grade pitching arm, and it'll still fucking hurt you.
I digress. Shit, I led off with a digression. I took Em, who's about to start fourth grade blissfully ignorant of what it's like to stand in the batter's box while a third grade Mad Hungarian wannabe uses you for target practice, to a baseball game. This is more or less an annual event.
My employer is a generous one. Not perfect, but generous, and since Chiefs tickets are wildly expensive and practically impossible to get for 130 employees, baseball offers the company a chance to give us a perk better than average while being realistic. These aren't shitty seats, they're club-level most years, and have been plaza level one year. It's a season ticket package with four seats and a parking pass. You sign up for the dates you prefer, the person with the seniority gets the parking pass and it's minimum two tickets per employee.
But baseball isn't that popular, and more often than not, I not only get free parking via seniority, but I get four tickets. Sometimes for more than one game. People are too busy, or out of town, or whatever the day the tickets they signed up for, and they look at the chart and give their pair to whoever has the other two.
One year, Frau Lobster extracted a promise that I not accept any more free tickets because it was breaking us. Financially, even with free admission and parking, the fuel to navigate my truck to the stadium, and buy minimal concessions was too much. The 'free' tickets ended up costing us, on average, $25 a game.
Maybe that's why some of my coworkers beg off on theirs...
Anyway, I'd just read 'Moneyball' by my tied-for-favorite (tied with James Gleick) non-fiction writer Michael Lewis, who profiled Billy Bean. Using unorthodox approaches to evaluating talent to win his division with the second lowest salary in the league. That speaks to all my soft spots: heterodoxy, the underdog winning, proving that deep pockets don't necessarily mean you get the 'best,' a failed player who can write his own ticket as a manager, this is great stuff. In the end of the book, Bean is turning down big money to go coach the Boston Red Sox. Maybe, in retrospect, not the best career move ever, but it made me like him even more.
The A's were also my hometown team, or they were around the time I was born near here. They moved, along with the Dodgers and Giants, to California, gold-rush style. And there was a drug lord, err, pharmaceutical robber-baron, willing to do the philanthropy thing. From what I recall hearing, he put out feelers to figure whether Kansas City preferred a burn hospital for kids or a baseball team.
We got a baseball team. I don't know if that falls under the 'baseball is bad for my self esteme' heading, or just 'God, this town sucks sometimes.'
And while Kaufman was alive, he bought talent as necessary. he retired numbers on the wall at this stadium are no small beer. It's been 20 years since the Royals won a World Series, but I can't tell you how many times I've heard names of players on winning teams, including last year's Boston Red Sox, who came up through the Royals' farm team. These guys get louder cheers in KC as the visiting team player than our current crop, normally.
Now, more or less, when the other kids...I mean owners, find out the Royals have a decent player, they buy him off.
So aside from liking Michael Lewis' portrayal of Billy Bean, what was my 'rooting interest?' Not much. The Royals have (last I checked) the second worst record in baseball, as they did last year. This is worse, in my mind, than being absolute last. At least there's a distinction in being the shittiest. Second shittiest? So I can root against the hometeam in a vague way, hoping Tampa Bay (last I checked they had the absolute worst record) might pick up a few games and save the Royls from being completely undistinguished.
I know, with fans like me, who needs enemies.
Also, I don't believe millionaires employed by millionaires to play a game should be subsidized by taxpayers (who are mostly not millionaires, and never will be no matter what the lottery commercials say). While I find it implausible that a sport of waning popularity could support four or five teams in the New York metro area (Yankees, Giants, Dodgers, Mets, am I missing a team or two?), I fail to see what the Bay Area gained by whoring their tax base to get both one of New York's 'extra' teams and Kansas City's only team. And the A's haven't gotten much more notice from Californians than, say, the Kansas City Royals. I don't think most Oakies even noticed the arrival of the team until Al Davis whored the Raiders down to L.A. Now that he's conned the Oakland taxpayers into rebuying their own team, I bet a rambling sampling on the streets of Oakland would turn up more vials of crack, prostitots and actual Hell's Angels members, than A's fans. Or even people who know Oakland has a Major League franchise.
But the bad actors who are responsible for most of this financial mayhem (on the baseball front) are helping FDR with the wheel-chair access ramps to various circles of Hell. Al Davis is regrettably still alive, but that's a different sport. So who to root for?
Since the Royals haven't seemed to embrace that 'money isn't the answer' philosophy that has (sometimes) served Oakland well, I rooted for the A's. It felt less perverse than just rooting for the Royals to have the worst record in the game.
The Royals are presently owned not by a philanthropist who thinks a burn hospital is equivalent to a baseball team. Instead, the team is owned by a guy who (as far as I know) has gotten rich off $10 Bangladeshi jeans sold by Wal-Mart. In my book, that means he's an asshole who's worse than the Kaufmans, who only sold drugs.
I don't know who owns the Oakland A's, and don't tell me because then I'll regret attending the game entirely.
Thanks to baseball's new high standards, the players are without a constant supply of amphetamines and anambolic steroids. Consequently, it was five innings before anyone hit a ball. Still, it was a close game, with a pitcher from each side getting 'lit up' by the batters eventually. Em liked the idea that the pitcher was getting 'lit up,' having the ultimate bad day at the office when four or five guys would hit his pitches. We also speculated about whether a home run it into your own team's bullpen is maybe a little worse than having the ball wacked into General Admission or the fountains.
If you're pitching, and the home run lands in your team's bullpen, you gotta figure the other pitchers notice. They're on the same team, but are really your rivals in every way. They have a harder time focusing on the game, now that the Family Size jar of greenies isn't being passed around, that's gotta snap you out of your daydreaming, or your nostalgic conversation with a fellow reliever about how great Dianabol had been.
Em and I both agreed the fireworks they did after were better than the game.
So how was this bad for my self esteem? Aside from watching several hit-less innings where I might as well have been the guy in the batter's box, I gave two tickets away. Again.
I mentioned having four tickets, right? This is because a coworker who had the other two was going to be out of town. Em unable to find anyone available and willing to submit to the game. I also failed to attract guests, despite my parking pass (a $9 'value' itself) and club-level tickets with a face price of $22 each.
So I did what I always do in this situation. The opposite of scalping. I approach some pair I see waiting to spend money on admission and give them my extras. These are adjacent seats, so I pay a little attention: no one who looks like they got out of jail this morning.
Four or five times, I've done this. Given away $44 worth of tickets to people waiting to buy seats, and I've never seen the people I give the tickets to on the inside of the park.
Do they hawk the good seats for cash and buy G.A.? Are stadium officials wating for me to turn my back so they can club these people into submission for not spending money at the gate?
No, it's me. I'm certain of it. It's not my long hair, the same thing happened when I shaved my head in the summer. And long hair, short or none, I'm with an adorable child. A child who's adorable enough to charm even people who think they don't like kids.
The seats are good. Very good. Less than 100 feet on one side is the press box, about the same distance the other way is the 'club,' where people spend big bucks on dinner while ignoring the game from behind glass. The 'luxury suites' are up behind where we sit, and from what I hear that's the most ridiculously expensive way to see the game of all. Why any actual fan would prefer those booths to a seat down where you can hurl insults at the guy in the on-deck circle is beyond me. But people waiting in line for tickets aren't buying a fucking luxury suite, and I'll bet they aren't buying the seats down there where you can smell the catcher's farts.
One time, I could see it, but every time I give these tickets away, I sit with Em next to a pair of empty seats. And this was a fairly full stadium. I don't know what the body count was, but the stadium was as full as I've seen it since the Orioles were in town with Cal Ripken Jr. on his last season.
Last game before school starts for a lot of people. Plus, it was dollar night for hot dogs, small sodas, peanuts; they had so many concessions discounted that I spent less than $20 despite having two beers (I almost never buy beer at a baseball game because of the combination of crappy product, stingy servings, and high prices). Instead of having to tel Em about making choices, I was able to provide her with more concessions than she could consume. It was also Friday, which means a kick-ass post-game fireworks display, one that clogs the air with smoke so bad you worry about people with asthma who might have strayed into the stadium.
And there were nostalgia fans, old-timers who remember the Kansas City A's, they came out in force. Neither of these teams has any playoff hopes (that I know of), but baseball fans (odd even by Lobster standards) love that shit. The inter-league games when St. Louis comes to town, they actually sell the park out with people wanting to see a supposed rematch of the 1985 World Series (though all the players and coaches from back then are dead or at least retired).
And the seats I gave away were empty. Again. I know there's better seats, but not much. I have photographic evidence. Is it my pits? Do I smell? Can people just sense that I'm the kind of creep who brings a book to the game in case I get bored?
The field from my seat
Speaking of which, they could dispense with the Minnesota Multi-phase Personality Inventory for ADD cases: if you can sit through a baseball game without additional entertainment, you have a suprlus of attention, give the players your amphetamines.
Anyway, when you give away tickets more expensive than you'd buy to someone waiting in line for tickets, then never see that person even though the seats you gave away are adjacent to your own... How many times does this have to happen before you start to wonder if the same people who groaned when you were up to bat are frightened by your very presense as a spectator? Yeah, I know I'm a troll. But I try to conjure up the kind of troll who could give me a free upgrade like that, a troll I wouldn't want to sit by for fear of cooties or conversation.
I can't seem to imagine this troll without including escapees from Wards Island (and you wouldn't expect too many of them to swim the Harlem River, and immediately head for a baseball game in Kansas City). True, that would be a crazy thing to do, especially since they could just walk over the pedestrian bridge. But the people in Ward's Island are a different kind of crazy. From what I've heard 'criminally insane.' And I can't see a criminally insane guy giving away free club-level tickets while escorting his nine-year-old daughter to the turnstiles.
The press box from my seat
Oh, the A's won 5 to 4. It came down to the last at-bat for the Royals, but as meaningless as the victory might have been, Oakland took it. Without having to expose Em to the 'extra innings' I'd explained were theoretically possible down to that last out. She seemed truly fascinated that grown men could play a game at the professional level without having any idea when it might end. And that, even though they get paid a king's ransom for playing, they wimp out if it rains.
Still, she's a bright girl, and I think she understands that a tie is the negation of competition. I think she was also glad (despite rooting for the home team) that the game didn't go into 'extra innings.' Nine is enough to wait through for a fireworks display.
Still, except my daughter, no one will sit with me...
8 comments:
Well, at least you didn't bring a book to Quaker meeting like I did. I guess that says something distinctly un-holy about me!
I've never been to a D-backs game down here. Like the Royals, we sell off the talent and get back nothin'. Sigh. Nice stadium, though, from what I hear. And downtown. I've walked past it a lot...
I never brought a book, I looped pornographic fantasies about Lydia mostly. Not particularly holy ground, and I only went to Friends Meetings because I was so convinced Reagan was about to draft me and send me, well, I wasn't clear where, but I didn't want to go. I was dodging a non-existent draft, and so dense that I didn't notice the back-hoes & such digging up Burdella's back yard half a block up, didn't know who Burdella was until a couple of years later. And I had no clue that Lydia was gay until I found out she and her (in my assumption, room-mate) had 'married' in a religious ceremony there in the middle of the week.
I’m lost as to how (major league) baseball still exists. I think I grew out of it once I started becoming older than the players. And once the yearly salaries started eclipsing what I will never even tally in my whole life (and I have to surely have a far better percentage of doing suitable work than 20% (.200)).
Sure, as a kid George Brett, Mike Schmidt, Don Mattingly; these guys were supermen. And not paid anywhere near these ‘roided up freaks playing nowadays.
I can’t see how anyone can respect a game that knowingly allows cheating; Palmerio, who just entered the fairly exclusive 3000-hit club, and recently testified (with finger pointing) that he has “never” taken steroids, is now guilty of doing such. Punishment? 10 game suspension (or something like that).
In my field if I ‘falsify’ data and get caught, I probably wont have a job in the field again. Are any of his hits taken away? Are Sammy “corky” Sosa’s homeruns taken away? No, all is forgiven after a small ‘time out’ and eventually the Hall of Fame will be even more tainted.
I just don’t get it.
And the sport was *entirely* ruined with the emergence of the “wild card”.
Sorry, ‘bo socks’ fans, you still haven’t truly broken the non-World Series streak, cuz you were in second place. You won on the wild card, something created by the TV exces so that almost assuredly the Red Sux and the Yankees will meet in the post season every year, which brings in more advertising dollars that most of the World Series matches.
One of the best things about baseball was the trueness that the team had to be in first place. Unlike hockey and the other sports where one can actually have a *losing* record and still make the playoffs!
So an asterisk should really be next to the Socks of Red’s “win”, since its an invention only a few years and if it *were* in place the whole time such a losing record would *never* even have existed.
And even if it were a fer-real win, that streak is one of the legends of the game, when that’s wiped out so is the legend. When myths die there aint much left.
Apparently people are so gawdamn bored that this still works as entertainment.
I've never liked baseball. Even as a kid, maybe especially as a kid. I remember being fascinated with Reggie Jackson, but I didn't even know what team he played for.
But the days you're talking about, of George Brett and Reggie Jackson and so on, they were doped up then too. It makes me question the warnings of how dangerous anabolic steroids and amphetamines are, because baseball players should be dropping like flies and growing bitch-tits from the doping.
In George Brett's day, they literally kept quart-size glass candy jars of Dexedrine in clubhouses. 'Coaches coffee' is a baseball term for coffee that only has caffeine, no speed added. In a sport that only recently started doing ANY drug testing, I'm unconvinced that Soza and his ilk are the first juicers. If anything, they just have better dope and doctors with more experience doping athletes.
For that matter, the NFL, which now has pretty stringent drug testing (random, year round, Marshall Faulk mentioned in an interview that he got a call on an off-season vacation in the Bahamas to report to a site ten minutes away for an immediate piss-in-the-cup), is relatively new to it. Olympic athletes have had anti-doping rules for as long as I can remember, but Lawrence Taylor played at least three of his seasons for the New York Giants while high on crack. And smoking a rock of coke before a game was a performance enhancer (besides being addictive as hell). Yeah, he was a talented athlete and a ferocious linebacker, but without freebase, his career might have been less spectacular. It sucks, but lacking a drug policy, I don't even know that it's cheating.
You mentioned your own work. My job will drug test for cause as part of a 'drug free workplace' thing, but the Ritalin I take to manage my ADHD could be argued to be 'doping.' I make fewer mistakes, stay on task better, and am less obnoxious to my coworkers with the meds. If I was an athlete in any sport that tested for drugs, I'd test positive for dope. If I have a workplace injury, they'll find the methylphenidate in my pee and I'll have to document that I have a legit prescription and a medical reason for taking it.
As far as how baseball has survived, it's a bit of a mystery to me. It televises poorly, as does golf and auto racing. At the game, it's a social thing. People talk to one another, and not just about the game. There's a minor league team in KCK, the T-Bones, I've never been but I hear they have picnic table seating in one section. So you sit facing other fans and have to turn to see the game.
Auto racing, in person, turned out to be amusing if not as enthralling as some people make it out to be, but because of the noise factor its an utterly un-social sport to attend.
Golf isn't even a sport, it's a game. Skill is involved, but you can't get your nose broken, you're unlikely to get killed by anything other than lightning, and my father in law can still play it well at the age of 77. So it's more like poker, but a poker game doesn't use as much real estate.
Oh, and I didn't know baseball had introduced a wild card. I like the wild card in Football, because there's a short season and often you have two teams in a division who are really better than any of the teams in another division. With ten times as many games, it seems like there'd be less chance of, for instance, a team with the third best record in the league being excluded from the playoffs.
Hockey baffles me. They only, after what, two seasons of not playing at all, are coming back with a new rule that you can't have a tie in a regular season game. What the fuck, I never realized you could have a tie in a regular season game before, but it explains why hockey is so unpopular.
But Hockey and the NBA both have ridiculously long post-seasons from what I've seen. And the NBA, if they wanted to make it a sporting event instead of pro-wresting with an orange ball, they'd adjust the court to the modern player.
That 10 foot basket height was designed for guys under six feet tall, not over seven feet. They should make the court 30% larger or so, raise the goal to 15 feet. Then it'd be a sport for these endocrine-disorders in sneakers.
Women's basketball is actually kind of fun to watch. Not for girl-watching, they wear such unflattering uniforms that any sex appeal pretty much goes away. But because they don't have the height and size of the NBA monsters, they actualy play defense and have to know how to shoot.
[b]But the days you're talking about, of George Brett and Reggie Jackson and so on, they were doped up then too.[/b]
Maybe, but I’m not thinking so. Certainly not so much. Physique alone tells us this (granted the chemistry involved to ‘perfect’ these concoctions has greatly changed). Back then an athlete actually, you know, dove for a ground ball. Got their uniform dirty.
[b]You mentioned your own work. My job will drug test for cause as part of a 'drug free workplace' thing,[/b]
I mentioned it just in work-output. If they want to drug test me they’ll get a sweet “fick dich” right quick. Not that I’m not pretty damn clean on all levels, but I can’t see the point of such testing for my job. Or yours. Unless you started driving a public bus and didn’t tell me.
Yes, sports=social. Not that it helps communication in any way. And I think the non-Hockey season has proved that if these overweight adolescents with a bit too many underlying homo-erotic fantasy issues can’t talk about padded men hitting a puck, they’ll just talk about something else.
[B]Auto racing, in person, turned out to be amusing if not as enthralling as some people make it out to be, but because of the noise factor its an utterly un-social sport to attend.[/b]
I can’t see how a bunch of not-very-bright-people repeatedly turning left makes a “sport”.
[B]Golf isn't even a sport, it's a game. Skill is involved, but you can't get your nose broken,[/b]
As with all these things, the idea of watching someone do it is just beyond me. Taking part? Fine. But yes, I used to say that “if you don’t sweat, it aint a sport”. Back when I gave sports a very small portion of thought.
[b]Oh, and I didn't know baseball had introduced a wild card.[/b]
Yes, that’s how the Red Sux have their little diamond rings. I don’t recall how old the new rule is…no more than 10 years. Maybe closer to 7.
[b] I like the wild card in Football, because there's a short season and often you have two teams in a division who are really better than any of the teams in another division.[/b]
Yes, with just 16 (?) games in a season there is a better chance to have some kind of foul up, with baseball’s 162 (?), there’s *plenty* of time for a competition. To me that was one of the nice (pure) things about baseball: number one is all that matters. Or to quote everyone’s favourite band-aid faced, gold toothed “rapper”: “two is not a winner and three no body remembers”. [the first and last time I ever hope to quote “Nelly”]
Yes, Hockey can tie, same with footba…excuse me, soccer. Which is why it never takes off with America. Which I _do_ understand. Sport is about winning. Fuck ties. Bring in the “off sides” line and there will be no ties. Goalies and defensive players are paid a shitload of money: they can deal with a few metres less protection.
[B]But Hockey and the NBA both have ridiculously long post-seasons from what I've seen [/b]
Because of all this ridiculous schematic that allows x number of teams to enter the playoffs. I kid you not; you can have a LOSING record and still make the playoffs. Might as well skip the season and draw straws for the playoffs. Needless to say it’s not terribly surprising that America can’t even get the word “competition” correct. A bit like the non-use of “democracy”.
Ack, I can’t go back and edit those [] to <>…sorry ‘bout that…message board brainwashing…
The non-use of deocracy? America is a republic, not a democracy. California, on the other hand, is the textbook illustration of the old Greek addage that democracy only survives until people realize they can vote themselves largess from the purse.
Obviously a sport that allows a losing record into the playoffs sucks. But then, a sport ca suck for so many reasons (and they all do to an extent).
America is a republic, not a democracy.
Well, wildly off topic for this blog, but I’d say that definition is also being outright bastardized.
Or maybe just updated. The times they are changing, etc.
Obviously a sport that allows a losing record into the playoffs sucks. But then, a sport ca suck for so many reasons (and they all do to an extent).
I agree. Just another form of twisted, brilliantly overpaid entertainment for the mostly brain-dead.
Post a Comment